Starving the Beast

September 12, 2005  ·  Filed under: Criticisms, Education

One of the strangest criticisms I’ve heard of the FairTax has been from the ideological Libertarians. Being one of that rare breed myself, I understand the criticism, but cannot see the point.

FairTax proponents consider one of the greatest assets to the plan the incredible increase in economic growth in this nation. That increase in growth will provide benefits and advancement in our society at an absolutely incredible pace. As the economy increases, of course, tax revenues will also increase greatly to our government, shoring up the budget deficit and unfunded programs like Social Security and Medicare. To those of us who hate budget deficits, this is an incredibly strong point. To the ideological Libertarians who hate government? Fully funding government programs will only keep them going, and the ideological Libertarians want those programs to go away.

I should point out that I, as an ideological (small-l) libertarian, would absolutely love to see those programs go away. Neal Boortz is an ideological Libertarian, and would love to see those programs go away. But at the same time, that’s a different debate.

When the ideological Libertarians are claiming that these increased federal tax revenues are a bad thing, they can’t see the forest for the trees. Each time they decry the increase in revenues, they are essentially saying “You shouldn’t dare grow the economy by a dollar, because $0.23 will go to the government!” They are saying that economic growth, if it has the downside of increasing federal tax revenues, shouldn’t occur.

In our current political environment, those programs are not going away. While I’d love to see major reform to Social Security and Medicare, and would love to see the government shrink, it doesn’t look likely in the near future. And trying to “starve the beast” doesn’t work when the beast prints its own money. If the Fairtax will grow our economy at a much stronger pace and thus also increases federal revenues, that’s a tradeoff I’m willing to make. Just as I don’t refrain from working to avoid paying income tax, or refrain from investing to avoid capital gains tax, I won’t refuse economic growth just because the government might get higher tax revenues. Tax reform is the battle of the day, and the FairTax is the best plan I’ve come across. I’ll save my attempts to strangle government for tomorrow.

Posted by Brad Warbiany  ·  Trackback URL  ·  Link
 
One Response to “Starving the Beast”
  1. Most tax payers are oblivious to how much tax they pay. Furthermore, beast acquires new hidden taxes every year (e.g. AMT bracket creep). The FairTax eliminates most imbedded and hidden taxes and shows us the full tax burden (in %) with each purchase. This transparent display should attract more supporters to help lash down the beast

    With FairTax, the ideological Libertarians can choose to “starve the beast” by not spending. They can earn and produce all they want—just don’t spend it. I think that is a better approach than our only current option of not working to “starve the beast.”

    Bill Rook  ·  Sep 12, 2005 at 8:09 pm  ·  Permalink

Leave a Reply