<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the VAT a force behind corporatism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fairtaxblog.com/20120520/is-the-vat-a-force-behind-corporatism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fairtaxblog.com/20120520/is-the-vat-a-force-behind-corporatism/</link>
	<description>News and Discussion of the FairTax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:33:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morphh</title>
		<link>http://www.fairtaxblog.com/20120520/is-the-vat-a-force-behind-corporatism/#comment-17671</link>
		<dc:creator>Morphh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fairtaxblog.com/?p=596#comment-17671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree with Hank and Stephen...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Hank and Stephen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Eldridge</title>
		<link>http://www.fairtaxblog.com/20120520/is-the-vat-a-force-behind-corporatism/#comment-17670</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Eldridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fairtaxblog.com/?p=596#comment-17670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do not think it matters at all, but VAT is not my expertise.

Each producer in the chain takes credit for VAT paid, by subtracting it from VAT received, so that he remits only VAT on the value he added. So, I think the net result should be the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think it matters at all, but VAT is not my expertise.</p>
<p>Each producer in the chain takes credit for VAT paid, by subtracting it from VAT received, so that he remits only VAT on the value he added. So, I think the net result should be the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Van Gieson</title>
		<link>http://www.fairtaxblog.com/20120520/is-the-vat-a-force-behind-corporatism/#comment-17669</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Van Gieson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fairtaxblog.com/?p=596#comment-17669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joshua,

Welcome back to the discussions.  What used to be the most informative and unbiased blog has been deadly quiet of late.  I hope that changes.

As for the VAT issue, I&#039;m no expert (or econo-geek) but I don&#039;t think it matters if the producer is a large corporation that can produce the item in-house or a series of smaller businesses that each add a part of the final product.  Here&#039;s why.

If the government sets up a 10% VAT, for example, it doesn&#039;t matter if there is one level of production or ten, the total tax collected is still 10% of the final cost.  While the dollar value accumulates as a part moves up through the production cycle, the percentage tax does not.  As the name indicates, only the value added is important.  Many small companies producing a single component of the final item would not be at a disadvantage with one  large corporation that produces the end item in-house.

I&#039;m not certain which producer might have lower retail prices, but I sort of think many small producers, all having lower overhead costs, might win out?  Just a thought]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua,</p>
<p>Welcome back to the discussions.  What used to be the most informative and unbiased blog has been deadly quiet of late.  I hope that changes.</p>
<p>As for the VAT issue, I&#8217;m no expert (or econo-geek) but I don&#8217;t think it matters if the producer is a large corporation that can produce the item in-house or a series of smaller businesses that each add a part of the final product.  Here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>If the government sets up a 10% VAT, for example, it doesn&#8217;t matter if there is one level of production or ten, the total tax collected is still 10% of the final cost.  While the dollar value accumulates as a part moves up through the production cycle, the percentage tax does not.  As the name indicates, only the value added is important.  Many small companies producing a single component of the final item would not be at a disadvantage with one  large corporation that produces the end item in-house.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not certain which producer might have lower retail prices, but I sort of think many small producers, all having lower overhead costs, might win out?  Just a thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
